Best AI Agent Papers

Best AI Agent Papers · 2026-W42

Ranking window: 2026-07-20 – 2026-10-17 Frozen on 2026-10-18

3

ABot-World-0: an action-conditioned world model streaming interactive 720p worlds on a single desktop GPU

ABot-World-0 is an action-conditioned video world model trained on multi-source data from AAA games, simulation engines and internet videos, controlled through raw keyboard input with reference-character memory for consistent third-person rollouts. The authors report streaming 720p at up to 16 FPS on one RTX 5090 with 1.2s action-to-first-frame latency, targeting real-time long-horizon closed-loop interaction.

  • 6 stars/7d
  • 6 citations
  • 313 upvotes
4

Ouroboros: a coding agent that evolves its own tools, prompts and core through reviewed commits

Ouroboros is a self-developing coding-agent harness whose tools, prompts, context assembly and even core implementation improve through reviewed commits that become its later runtime, with two evolution modes: recursive free evolution and experience-driven core evolution. The authors also report a 161-day live deployment across seven human communication surfaces, arguing safety guardrails must stay authoritative while the agent rewrites its own code.

  • 115 stars/7d
  • 2 citations
  • 92 upvotes
  • #1 osworld-verified
6

nanoMuse: an open-source personal agent that lives on your phone and computer, with memory you can actually read

After Meta's closed Muse demo showed what a single-person agent with lasting memory could look like, this report reconstructs how Muse is built from public sources, then ships nanoMuse as its GPL-3.0 open counterpart: one agent across the devices you own, sharing a single conversation over a relay anyone can self-host. Every action passes a Sentinel gate before it executes, memory is stored as plain files the owner can read, and the underlying model is the user's choice.

  • 597 stars/7d
  • 0 citations
  • 98 upvotes
7

ATAS: gives video-generation agents a persistent world memory so every shot stays in the same place and timeline

Making a long film with a video-generation agent breaks down at the seams: passing prompts or a few recent frames between shots gives the model neither a shared spatial frame for revisiting a scene nor a time-indexed record for replaying an earlier event. ATAS compiles a screenplay into shot requests with explicit location, camera, and event-time references, and keeps two memories behind the generation loop: a scene memory of registered static geometry and an event memory of dynamic observations indexed by scene, event, and time. Each generated clip is reconstructed and registered back, admitted only after review and state checks. The authors report that this improves all measured cross-shot consistency metrics across four video generators, outperforms compared agents and 3D-guided methods on spatial revisits and event recapture, and earns the highest human ratings on all six evaluated criteria.

  • 258 stars/7d
  • 0 citations
  • 338 upvotes
8

AutoDesign: a meta-harness optimizer that teaches a code agent to recursively improve how it designs posters

AutoDesign treats multimodal conference-poster generation as a long-horizon agentic process: a meta-harness optimizer reads rollout feedback and rewrites the harness the code agent runs on. On the authors' 100-paper PosterBench it scores above Claude Design, the learned harness lifts seven different code-agent configurations, and a fully autonomous loop makes 253 tool calls in 40 minutes for under $3.

  • 9 stars/7d
  • 3 citations
  • 63 upvotes
9

Raven: an open ecosystem that builds, evolves and orchestrates agent harnesses for long-horizon tasks

Raven argues that hand-crafted agent harnesses are too domain-coupled to scale with long-horizon, cross-domain workloads. It treats each model–harness pair as a composable unit of intelligence: a Host Agent decomposes goals and coordinates specialized sub-agents, a host archive and EverOS retain experience across tasks, and Skill Forge turns that experience into reusable procedures — with theory on expanding reliable task coverage under one resource budget.

  • 142 stars/7d
  • 0 citations
  • 493 upvotes
10

A framework for agents that rewrite their own scaffolding: prompts, memory, and tools, with the model frozen

This 66-page position-style paper formalizes harness self-evolution: an agent keeps its model weights fixed but continually revises its own software scaffolding, including prompts, memory, workflows, executable components, and plugins. Accepted revisions persist across runs, and the authors separate what can be updated from the proposal and admission mechanisms, analyzing reliability with PAC-learning-style bounds and an admission rule that requires fresh independent validation data. The paper argues this demands continual validation plus independent safeguards on runtime privileges and consequential actions.

  • 178 stars/7d
  • 0 citations
  • 193 upvotes
11

EvoOntology: a self-evolving semantic layer that lets data agents query heterogeneous data through an MCP server

EvoOntology tackles the agent-data gap: agents can see column names and file paths through generic tools, but not what the data actually means. It wraps an ontology (schema, content, and tool layers) as an MCP server the agent can query at runtime, uses a builder agent to construct it autonomously, and keeps refining it with attribution-guided edits that are only accepted after a paired evaluation against the backbone. The authors report consistent gains over strong baselines and hand-built semantic layers across three data-agent benchmarks and four LLM backbones.

  • 187 stars/7d
  • 0 citations
  • 126 upvotes
13

A fully open stack for computer-use agents: models decide when to click and when to run code, with all harnesses and trajectories released

OpenGCUA rebuilds the computer-use agent stack in the open, motivated by the observation that frontier systems like GPT-6 Astra's computer use are closed. Its core idea is to let the model choose between visual GUI actions and direct code execution, so intermediate results can steer later steps; it also proposes harness-to-model decision transfer, moving selected observation and task-state decisions out of fixed harness rules and into the model itself. The authors report that on OSWorld-v2 their full configuration improves task scores across all eight evaluated models (including GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus 5), raising mean partial score by +19.6 points and cutting reported steps per task by 53.0% on average versus batched GUI-only execution. Alongside the implementation and prompts they release evaluation trajectories from all eight models, plus early versions of a real-device harness and a cross-device SDK covering computers, mobiles, and browsers; on four real macOS tasks their harness shows selected Qwen3.8-Max runs use 19.4 times as many reported reasoning tokens as GPT-6 Astra, which they highlight as a gap in real-device execution efficiency.

  • 99 stars/7d
  • 0 citations
  • 315 upvotes
15

A benchmark where agents play forward-deployed engineers who must clarify vague requirements and deliver working fixes

FDE-Gym tests agents on the last mile of AI delivery instead of well-specified issue tickets. It builds 95 end-to-end delivery tasks from 20 customer scenarios across 18 sectors, each adapted by industry experts from real delivery projects; agents interact with scripted stakeholders and modify production-like customer systems, and a delivery is scored by how much it improves the customer's own success metric, normalized between 0 (unchanged) and 1 (reference solution), with penalties for excessive messages, trial runs, and waiting. The authors report the best of 13 model configurations from seven providers scores only 0.56 on average and fully resolves just 14 of 95 tasks, with unstated-constraint discovery as the main bottleneck; even on the 23 tasks where the best configuration extracted every key fact, it reached the 0.8 uplift threshold on only 10.

  • 99 stars/7d
  • 0 citations
  • 280 upvotes

This week · Best AI Agent Papers